label index  ▪  name index jukebox  ▪  lightbox  ▪  memberlist  ▪  help  ▪  about this site  ▪ russian

Home > . . > . . > Universal Record I > Vladimir's romance - O give me oblivion

Featured  |  Last Comments  |  Search


Vladimir’s romance - O give me oblivion (Ðîìàíñ Âëàäèìèðà - Î, äàé ìíå çàáâåíüå, ðîäíàÿ) (Opera «Dubrovsky», act 1)
 

 
Vladimir’s romance - O give me oblivion (Ðîìàíñ Âëàäèìèðà - Î, äàé ìíå çàáâåíüå, ðîäíàÿ) (Opera «Dubrovsky», act 1)
 
 zoom       mirror
 
 

details

on other languages: Ðóññêèé

 Get code to share this record Download JPG file Download MP3 file Print label Send E-card


Base fundPre-Revolutionary recordings 
"Ðîìàíñú Äóáðîâñêàãî"
Èçú îï. "Äóáðîâñêié", ìóç.
Íàïðàâíèêà
Àðò. Èìï. Ìàð. òåàò. À.Ì.Äàâûäîâú
¹ 2136

From the collection of Yuri Bernikov
Mirror Transcription: 12136
Record Mini-Discography: Universal Record I > Vladimir’s romance - O give me oblivion (Ðîìàíñ Âëàäèìèðà - Î, äàé ìíå çàáâåíüå, ðîäíàÿ) (Opera «Dubrovsky», act 1)
Label Catalog No Mx/Ctr No Take Order No Censorial No Additional information
Universal Record > Universal Record I 2136 12136 Reissue (copied or re-recorded matrix)
Reverse Side 2137 12137
International Parlophon ... > International Parlophon (green) 12136 12136 Reissue (copied or re-recorded matrix) Base fund
International Parlophon ... > International Parlophon (green) 12136 12136 Reissue (copied or re-recorded matrix) Base fund
Title Name: Vladimir's romance - O give me oblivion
Language(s) or Ethnics: russian | Catalog category: Tenor with Orchestra | Genre (Music Category): Opera
Artist(s): Alexander Davydov
Composer, Larger Composition Name: Eduard Napravnik: Opera «Dubrovsky», act No 1
Lyrics By: Modest Tchaikovsky | Based on: Alexander Pushkin: The novel «Dubrovsky»
Accompaniment Type: Orchestra
Bandmaster or conductor:
Recording Place:
Transfer speed:
Record size: 25 cm
Additional keywords:  
Label file size: 518.5 KB | 1400x1400 px | Size of file MP3: 2.0 MB | 2:50 | 98 kbps x 44.1 kHz
Hits: 8983 | Label downloads: 99 | Audio downloads: 173
Added by: bernikov | 08.11.2006 02:16 | Last updated by:  bernikov | 04.04.2024 13:24
Rating:
9.62 (6 votes)
 
Artistic value: 10.00 (3 votes)
Ñollectable value: 10.00 (3 votes)
Label quality: 8.75 (4 votes)
Audio quality: 10.00 (3 votes)
 
Author Comment
Yuri Bernikov (bernikov)
Admin
There is an opinion, that this was a Piratical company
If it is the case, it has to be moved from "Rare" to the "Piratical" category
  08.11.2006 17:33
Offline User profile of Send an email message to    
Adrian Hindle-Briscall (Adrian)
Expert

Comments: 552
Join Date: 03.07.2009
but what is the origin?
The audio file has orchestral accompaniment and is surely not a 1902 recording.
  05.07.2009 19:06
Offline User profile of Send an email message to    
Yuri Bernikov (bernikov)
Admin
You are absolutely right!
I was too quick with my judgment about the origin... Let's wait until it surfaced.
  05.07.2009 19:13
Offline User profile of Send an email message to    
Adrian Hindle-Briscall (Adrian)
Expert

Comments: 552
Join Date: 03.07.2009
1908 Gramo?
Maybe it could be 4-22030 (6748r) of about 1908 or 1909.
  05.07.2009 21:03
Offline User profile of Send an email message to    
Yuri Bernikov (bernikov)
Admin
I have re-scaned labels in order to include mirrors.
There are matrix numbers that pretty much resemble "Syrena-Record" system. Unfortunately, there is a gap in Tomasz Lerski's book, but according to number sequence it could be March, 1912. BTW, it looks like catalog numbers were derived from the matrix numbers by dropping digit "1" from the left.
  06.07.2009 02:14
Offline User profile of Send an email message to    
Adrian Hindle-Briscall (Adrian)
Expert

Comments: 552
Join Date: 03.07.2009
Pirate or not?
I see what you mean about Syrena numbers. But if these were pirated, I would expect the makers to have carefully removed all traces of the original numbers, like Orpheon I think did. And if these numbers are missing from the Syrena listing, it could mean that Universal paid Syrena to record some issues for their own exclusive use. Or maybe the Universal label belonged to Syrena. A small record company with only a few issues is very likely not to have its own recording equipment, and even more likely not to have its own pressing plant. Certainly in the UK and Germany there were many labels, but only a few manufacturers.
  06.07.2009 11:07
Offline User profile of Send an email message to    
Yuri Bernikov (bernikov)
Admin
A.M.Davydov and Syrena
I read (do not remember where) that some pirate companies did not bother to erase the original matrix numbers, especially before the first copyright law was passed in Russia (March 20, 1911). Keeping the original matrix numbers was certainly unwise (if the word “wise” is applicable to the piratical business at all), may be that is why Universal records are so rare today?

There are plenty of gaps in Tomasz Lerski’s book, many records that present on this website are missing there. A.I.Zhelezny currently works on the most complete listing of Syrena records, may be these numbers will be listed there. If you can read this A.I.Zhelezny's article (sorry, it is currently in Russian only), you will find that A.M.Davydov DID record on Syrena and approximately at this time frame (January 1912).
  06.07.2009 18:10
Offline User profile of Send an email message to    
Adrian Hindle-Briscall (Adrian)
Expert

Comments: 552
Join Date: 03.07.2009
Syrena/A.I. Zhelezny
I can understand Russian a (very) little but I can't write it. I was very interested in early Soviet records many years ago and I corresponded with Anatoly almost a lifetime ago! Is he ever online here?
  06.07.2009 20:57
Offline User profile of Send an email message to    
Yuri Bernikov (bernikov)
Admin
A.I. Zhelezny
No, he is not registered here, but we communicate via e-mail.
  07.07.2009 02:22
Offline User profile of Send an email message to    
 
 

About this siteTerms of UsePrivacy StatementLinksContact UsGuestbook