label index  ▪  name index jukebox  ▪  lightbox  ▪  memberlist  ▪  help  ▪  about this site  ▪ russian

Home>. .>. .>Neographon (black, "noiseless")>Lisa's arioso - Ah, I am weary

Featured  |  Last Comments  |  Search


Lisas arioso - Ah, I am weary ( - , ) (Opera The Queen of Spades, act 3)
 

 
 
 zoom
 
 

details

on other languages: 

 Get code to share this record   Send E-card


Label Transcription:

Gold fundPre-Revolutionary recordings 


"I "
" "

23135

,
Mirror Transcription:  
Original matrix: Gramophone Co. # 342x
Label Catalog No Mx/Ctr No Take Order No Censorial No Additional information
Neographon > Neographon (black, "noiseless") 23135 23135 Copied or re-recorded matrix
Single-sided record
Pre-revolutionary > Gramophone Co. 23135 342x First edition??
Gramophone Co. > Concert (Angel) 23135 342x Reissue (original matrix) Gold fund
Gramophone Co. > Concert (Angel) 23135 342x First edition. Large Flush Label. No Angel Trademark on Backside. Reproduced in Hanover Gold fund
Title Name: Lisa's arioso - Ah, I am weary
Language(s) or Ethnics: russian | Genre (Music Category): Opera
Artist(s): Medea Mei Figner
Composer, Larger Composition Name: Pyotr Tchaikovsky: Opera The Queen of Spades, act No 3
Lyrics By: Modest Tchaikovsky | Based on: Alexander Pushkin: The story The Queen of Spades
Accompaniment Type: Piano
Bandmaster or conductor:
Recording Place: St.-Petersburg | Recording Date: 1901
Transfer speed: 78 RPM
Record size: 25 cm | Label size: 108 mm
Additional keywords:  
Label file size: 451.5 KB | 1317x1330 px | Audio file size : 4.1 MB | 3:00 | 192 kbps x 44.1 kHz
Hits: 1594
Added by: Rus | 11.07.2012 07:41 | Last updated by:  andrew-64 | 09.11.2017 18:14
Rating:
8.00 (3 votes)
 
Artistic value: 10.00 (1 votes)
ollectable value: 10.00 (1 votes)
Label quality: 9.00 (3 votes)
Audio quality: 5.67 (3 votes)
 
Author Comment
sobinovv
Expert
First edition?
This could not be a first edition. The first stamper of 1901 was modified with a raised ring surrounding the label area and stamped in catalogue number to create the stamper for this disc in 1903 or a little later.

Does a stamper II copy without CO. marking exist of this disc?

The old scratched in catalogue number is still visible below the stamped in number. My explanation is, that only one stamper could be grown from the wax original in 1901, and was in continuous use until then.
  10.03.2013 18:36
Offline User profile of Send an email message to    
bernikov
Admin
Re: First edition?
Thank you for the comment, I changed it to "Reissue"

sobinovv wrote:
The old scratched in catalogue number is still visible below the stamped in number. My explanation is, that only one stamper could be grown from the wax original in 1901, and was in continuous use until then.

Would you please elaborate your explanation? I do not understand why there is a new catalogue number over the old one. It looks like it is the same number...
  10.03.2013 22:19
Offline User profile of Send an email message to http://my.mail.ru/mail/ylb2/    
sobinovv
Expert
Re: First edition?
bernikov wrote:

Would you please elaborate your explanation? I do not understand why there is a new catalogue number over the old one. It looks like it is the same number...

Only pressings until autumn 1902 had scratched in catalogue numbers. In late 1902 or early 1903 the scratched in numbers were replaced by identical, but raised/stamped numbers.
  11.03.2013 00:29
Offline User profile of Send an email message to    
Rus
Member
, "" "" . , ! ?? ??
??
  30.04.2013 18:08
Offline User profile of Send an email message to    
bernikov
Admin
Re:
, , .

: - .

, , . " ".
  30.04.2013 21:52
Offline User profile of Send an email message to http://my.mail.ru/mail/ylb2/    
SchabOl
Member
", " . , .. . ( ), - . , , "". .
  10.11.2016 12:52
Offline User profile of Send an email message to    
 
 

About this siteTerms of UsePrivacy StatementLinksContact UsGuestbook